🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam decision, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to set aside a lower court's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to employ the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

With a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a national fight over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Typically, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield several additional Republican-leaning seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State attorney general hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A top House figure said the court had once again damaged its standing by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.